- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:13:35 +0200
- To: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- CC: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Jeff, +1 to option 1). Option 2) has a different meaning. +1 to all your other suggestions. Jean-Jacques. Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote: > REQUIREMENT > R046 > The description language MUST allow describing Messages independent of > specific wire format. (From JS. Last discussed 11 April, 2002.) > > COMMENT > R046 leaves the term "wire format" undefined. I have heard this term > often before, but never before in a context where the details of what is > meant matter quite so much. A definition or at least an example would > be useful. (Big-endian vs. little-endian? HTTP vs. SMTP? ASCII vs > UTF-7 vs UTF-8 vs Shift-JIS vs EBCDIC vs UTF-16? All of the above? None > of the above?) > > RECOMMENDATION > Reword: "The description language MUST describe Messages independent > from transfer encodings." or "The description language MUST describe > Messages in terms of the XML Infoset."
Received on Friday, 11 October 2002 04:13:26 UTC