W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Proposal for the removal of the message construct from WSDL 1.2

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:26:51 +0100
Message-ID: <3DDB474B.5050506@crf.canon.fr>
To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
CC: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

To clarify... are you suggesting that SOAP features properties 
should be (mapped to?) standard Infoset properties?


Martin Gudgin wrote:
> That makes sense, I wonder if one could go even further and access
> attachments via standard Infoset properties.
> Gudge
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
>>Sent: 19 November 2002 14:14
>>To: Martin Gudgin
>>Cc: Sanjiva Weerawarana; WS-Desc WG (Public)
>>Subject: Re: Proposal for the removal of the message 
>>construct from WSDL 1.2
>>+1, this is what I think the AF spec[1] was hinting at. SOAP
>>applications would access attachment via the "secondaryPartBag" 
>>property and would not have to worry about serialization details.
>>[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/07/SOAP-AF/aftf-soap-af.html
>>Martin Gudgin wrote:
>>>Personally I'd model attachments using an element decl and 
>>figure out 
>>>the actual serialization in the binding.
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2002 03:27:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:40 UTC