RE: Proposal for the removal of the message construct from WSDL 1.2

That makes sense, I wonder if one could go even further and access
attachments via standard Infoset properties.

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
> Sent: 19 November 2002 14:14
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: Sanjiva Weerawarana; WS-Desc WG (Public)
> Subject: Re: Proposal for the removal of the message 
> construct from WSDL 1.2
> 
> 
> +1, this is what I think the AF spec[1] was hinting at. SOAP
> applications would access attachment via the "secondaryPartBag" 
> property and would not have to worry about serialization details.
> 
> Jean-jacques.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/07/SOAP-AF/aftf-soap-af.html
> 
> Martin Gudgin wrote:
> > Personally I'd model attachments using an element decl and 
> figure out 
> > the actual serialization in the binding.
> 
>