+1, this is what I think the AF spec[1] was hinting at. SOAP applications would access attachment via the "secondaryPartBag" property and would not have to worry about serialization details. Jean-jacques. [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/07/SOAP-AF/aftf-soap-af.html Martin Gudgin wrote: > Personally I'd model attachments using an element decl and figure out > the actual serialization in the binding.Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 09:14:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT