W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2002

RE: R120 Fragment Proposal, second draft

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 19:22:45 -0800
To: <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01c501c286ea$e89a70e0$1f02a8c0@beasys.com>

Arthur,

I didn't see any response to my request to show how WSDL defined extensions
would be identified using the various syntaxes.  I can't tell whether you
intend to do it or not.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of ryman@ca.ibm.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:35 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: R120 Fragment Proposal, second draft
>
>
> I eliminated the urn:wsdl: schema, referenced XPointer Framework, and
> expanded the XML NUN and XPointer discussion.(See attached file:
> URI-References.html)
>
> Arthur Ryman
Received on Friday, 8 November 2002 00:51:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT