W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2002

RE: proposal for equivalence of top level items

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 20:41:15 -0800
Message-ID: <2E33960095B58E40A4D3345AB9F65EC109814466@win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Sanjiva, would it be safe to say that you are proposing we use
name-based equivalence for top-level WSDL components? (As opposed to
some sort of structural equivalence?)

--Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:28 AM
> To: Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Cc: WS-Desc WG (Public)
> Subject: Re: proposal for equivalence of top level items
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 11:05, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> >
> > I have a pending action item to propose equivalence rules for
> > top level items. Here it is, finally:
> >
> > schema stuff:
> >     out of scope
> >
> > <message>
> >     messages m1 and m2 are equivalent iff their QNames are the same
> >     (i.e., equal - using rules which someone else has defined for
> >     QName equivalence .. if these don't exist then we can define
them)
> >
> > <portType>
> >     pt1 and pt2 equivalent iff their QNames are the same
> >
> > <binding>
> >     iff QNames are equivalent
> >
> > <service>
> >     iff QNames are equivalent
> >
> > So basically its name equivalence for all ..
> 
> Not sure what you mean regarding equivalence. Is it an equivalence
> within a WSDL document, between two or more WSDL documents? What is
the
> level of equivalence? syntactic? semantic? If I use a message as an
> input and reuse it for an output, are they the same?
> 
> Philippe
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 23:41:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT