W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2002

Re: proposal for equivalence of top level items

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: 04 Nov 2002 14:28:08 -0500
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1036438089.25102.113.camel@jfouffa>

On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 11:05, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> I have a pending action item to propose equivalence rules for
> top level items. Here it is, finally:
> schema stuff:
>     out of scope
> <message>
>     messages m1 and m2 are equivalent iff their QNames are the same
>     (i.e., equal - using rules which someone else has defined for
>     QName equivalence .. if these don't exist then we can define them)
> <portType>
>     pt1 and pt2 equivalent iff their QNames are the same
> <binding>
>     iff QNames are equivalent
> <service>
>     iff QNames are equivalent
> So basically its name equivalence for all ..

Not sure what you mean regarding equivalence. Is it an equivalence
within a WSDL document, between two or more WSDL documents? What is the
level of equivalence? syntactic? semantic? If I use a message as an
input and reuse it for an output, are they the same?

Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 14:28:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:40 UTC