Re: [Pub-Sub-Task] Re: Some thoughts on wsdl pub/sub

So, in other words, you don't think we need a first class <event> 
element, as Sanjiva was suggesting? I am trying to understand 
your current position better.

Jean-Jacques.

Amelia A. Lewis wrote:
> In fact, our position is that if the SOAP 1.2 extensions mechanism is 
> supported, and adequate specification supplied for solicit/response and 
> notification, then publish/subscribe can be supported.
> 
> In other words, the bits that are needed are the following, all of which 
> are amenable to description as features or MEPs:
> 
> 1) message addressing (source, destination, reply to)
> 2) message correlation (id, references)
> 3) multiple recipients/respondents
> 4) server-initiated operations (solicit/response, notification)