"Sedukhin, Igor" wrote: > MEP definition could be an optional default extension complimenting SOAP binding (which is another optional default extension). I regard SOAP MEP as being at a higher level than this. IMO, they fit at the WSDL message level, not at the binding level. > Do you have an example of a simple SOAP sequence implementing a MEP? How would those URIs identifying MEPs look like in a SOAP message? I was trying to locate an example and couldn't find one... The current SOAP MEP is defined here [1] (request-response). Example 2 at [2] uses that MEP. Actually, most example today use that MEP, without knowing (just like Mr. Jourdain used prose). > It crosses with orchestration, so it may be difficult to coerce the scope to a service definition... Jean-Jacques. [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part2.html#singlereqrespmep [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/01/29/edcopy-soap12-part0-20020129.html#L977Received on Friday, 31 May 2002 04:32:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:27 GMT