W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

Re: ISSUE : Extensible message exchange patterns

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 10:30:29 +0200
Message-ID: <3CF734A5.9A6ADA18@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Sedukhin Igor" <Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>
CC: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@macromedia.com>, "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

"Sedukhin, Igor" wrote:

> MEP definition could be an optional default extension complimenting SOAP binding (which is another optional default extension).

I regard SOAP MEP as being at a higher level than this. IMO, they fit at the WSDL message level, not at the binding level.

> Do you have an example of a simple SOAP sequence implementing a MEP? How would those URIs identifying MEPs look like in a SOAP message? I was trying to locate an example and couldn't find one...

The current SOAP MEP is defined here [1] (request-response). Example 2 at [2] uses that MEP. Actually, most example today use that MEP, without knowing (just like Mr. Jourdain used prose).

> It crosses with orchestration, so it may be difficult to coerce the scope to a service definition...

Jean-Jacques.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part2.html#singlereqrespmep
[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/01/29/edcopy-soap12-part0-20020129.html#L977
Received on Friday, 31 May 2002 04:32:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT