W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

RE: Regarding your upcoming proposal for requiredness in extensio ns

From: Sedukhin, Igor <Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 12:41:54 -0400
Message-ID: <849C1D32E4C7924F854D8A0356C72A9E045DDF36@usilms08.ca.com>
To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
Cc: "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

I guess second one is easy, really, so I'm more concerned with 1.

-- Igor Sedukhin .. (Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788



-----Original Message-----
From: Sedukhin, Igor 
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:35 PM
To: 'Glen Daniels'
Cc: 'www-ws-desc@w3.org'
Subject: Regarding your upcoming proposal for requiredness in extensions


Glen,

I'd like to make sure it would be possible to take care of the following cases:

1. There is a namespace that defines an extension. There are 100 "top" elements which extend the WSDL language. The namespace has been accepted as a standard already (suppose that) and there are a few implementations using it. So it cannot be changed, elements cannot be regrouped or otherwise. I'd like to use all 100 elements in a WSDL and require the processor to understand them (if any of them appear in the WSDL doc).

2. There is a namespace that declares an attribute extension. I'd like to make sure WSDL processor has to understand that attribute when it is used. <wsdl:port myext:myattr="myvalue" ...

-- Igor Sedukhin .. (Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 12:43:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT