- From: Sedukhin, Igor <Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 12:41:54 -0400
- To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
- Cc: "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I guess second one is easy, really, so I'm more concerned with 1. -- Igor Sedukhin .. (Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com) -- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788 -----Original Message----- From: Sedukhin, Igor Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:35 PM To: 'Glen Daniels' Cc: 'www-ws-desc@w3.org' Subject: Regarding your upcoming proposal for requiredness in extensions Glen, I'd like to make sure it would be possible to take care of the following cases: 1. There is a namespace that defines an extension. There are 100 "top" elements which extend the WSDL language. The namespace has been accepted as a standard already (suppose that) and there are a few implementations using it. So it cannot be changed, elements cannot be regrouped or otherwise. I'd like to use all 100 elements in a WSDL and require the processor to understand them (if any of them appear in the WSDL doc). 2. There is a namespace that declares an attribute extension. I'd like to make sure WSDL processor has to understand that attribute when it is used. <wsdl:port myext:myattr="myvalue" ... -- Igor Sedukhin .. (Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com) -- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 12:43:03 UTC