W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

Agenda for 30 May 2002 WS Description WG

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 14:04:33 -0700
Message-ID: <330564469BFEC046B84E591EB3D4D59C0634BD10@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Web Service Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Dial in information (members only):

See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters. 

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.


1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is:
      Sandeep Kumar (fallbacks Mike McHugh, Johan Pauhlsson, Waqar
Sadiq, Adi Sakala)

2.  Approval of minutes [6].

3.  Review of Action items.

     2002.05.23: GlenD to post email adding an issue: Are MEP's hard 
                 coded in the spec, or can they be extended through 
     2002.05.23: JeffM to write up rationale for dropping operation
DONE 2002.05.23: Philippe to update status section of the usage
     2002.05.23: Philippe, Jonathan, Waqar to work on getting the usage
                 scenarios published 
DONE 2002.05.23: Prasad, JeffS close the current issue, and have Prasad 
                 open a new issue re-titled "Negative Acknowledgement" 
DONE 2002.05.23: Roberto to take another round at updating his

4.  Abstract Model TF.  New member: Sandeep.

5.  Usage Scenarios.
Publication status.

6.  This item intentionally left blank.

7.  Issues.  Issue list at [10]. Latest draft of the spec at [11].

No new issues

7a: Issue: Overloading operations
Awaiting action from JeffM?

7b. Issue: Extensibility/Open Content Model
Roberto's revised extensibility proposal (sorry, message doesn't appear
in the archive).  Straw poll on whether to pursue simplifications or
accept the proposal as is.

7c. Issue: Optional parts in <message/>
Thread starts at [22].  What is the status of this issue?

7d: Issue: Negative Acknowledgement
Issue recast at [12].

7e. Issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations?
Any proposals to better specify these ops?  Should we have a straw poll
on whether to close the issue or wait for a proposal?

7f. Issue(s): Non-SOAP HTTP Binding
Jeffrey refactored up the non-SOAP HTTP binding issues [25] and proposed
a solution for some of them in [26], [27], and [28].

7g. Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses?
Thread starts at [29].

7h. Issue: portType extensibility [30].

7i. Issue: service type [31].

- Jonathan

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002May/0029.html
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0149.html
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0232.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0004.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0182.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0183.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0204.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0009.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0197.html
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0075.html
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0076.html
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 17:05:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:38 UTC