I still think we need a better name that "one-way" for operations that can return faults. One-way means no response. A fault is a response message (albeit a special type of response). Hence one-way with a response is not one-way, it's two-way. BTW, I'd like to point out that Prasad is now using the term "one-way-with-faults" [1], which is ok, I think. Jean-Jacques. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0194.html Sandeep Kumar wrote: > Prasad:I support your viewpoint that "One way operations > SHOULD be able to return Faults."Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 04:50:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT