W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Revised extensibility proposal

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 22:28:18 +0600
Message-ID: <00b101c201ad$b1584fc0$0aaa7cca@lankabook2>
To: "Sedukhin, Igor" <Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I also think they basically say the same - except Jonathan
avoids defining basically unnecessary terms, which is always
good. So +1 for moving ahead and assigning Roberto the task
of writing this up for the spec (taking into account Jonthan's
simplifications).

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sedukhin, Igor" <Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>; "Jonathan Marsh"
<jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:19 PM
Subject: RE: Revised extensibility proposal


> The proposals do not contradict each other. What is there to choose? +1
for both then?
>
> -- Igor Sedukhin .. (Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com)
> -- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:08 PM
> To: Jonathan Marsh
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Revised extensibility proposal
>
>
> +1 for Jonathan's proposal.
>
> Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>
> > I still don't see why a simpler proposal won't work:
> >
> > 1) Open the content model to elements and attributes in other
> > namespaces.
> > 2) Mark required extensions with a <wsdl:extension namespace="..."/>
> > element.
> > 3) An interpreter of the WSDL document, encountering an element or
> > attribute marked as a required extension but not recognizing the
> > namespace of that element, must interpret the entire WSDL document as
> > "not understood".
> > 4) Certain elements can accept "architected extensions" which means
> > they don't have to be declared using the extension mechanism.  These
> > are not really extensions at all, just boundaries between embedded
> > namespaces.
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 12:28:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT