- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 16:10:55 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webMethods.com>
- cc: fablet@crf.canon.fr, <keithba@microsoft.com>, <prasad.yendluri@webMethods.com>, <Waqar.sadiq@eds.com>, <sanjiva@us.ibm.com>, <ksankar@cisco.com>, Web Services Description mailing list <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Hi all,
can someone please draft what the ServiceType addition to
abstract model (and the related changes) would look like?
I'm thinking of Sanjiva who was one of the proponents of
ServiceType. 8-)
Best regards,
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
http://www.systinet.com/
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Prasad Yendluri wrote:
> > 3) I don't believe we need Services as currently defined, I'd
> > rather see them implementing a single Service Interface (and
> > providing one or more InterfaceLocations for it).
>
> <PY>BTW, Service is not an entity at the abstract level but I see your
> point. I do think however being able to group portTypes (interfaces) is
> useful. As Sanjiva had been arguing for also, having ServiceTypes that
> group portTypes is more logical at the abstract level than going from
> portType to port and Service.
> </PY>
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 10:11:09 UTC