Hi all, can someone please draft what the ServiceType addition to abstract model (and the related changes) would look like? I'm thinking of Sanjiva who was one of the proponents of ServiceType. 8-) Best regards, Jacek Kopecky Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox) http://www.systinet.com/ On Tue, 21 May 2002, Prasad Yendluri wrote: > > 3) I don't believe we need Services as currently defined, I'd > > rather see them implementing a single Service Interface (and > > providing one or more InterfaceLocations for it). > > <PY>BTW, Service is not an entity at the abstract level but I see your > point. I do think however being able to group portTypes (interfaces) is > useful. As Sanjiva had been arguing for also, having ServiceTypes that > group portTypes is more logical at the abstract level than going from > portType to port and Service. > </PY>Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 10:11:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT