W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

[amtf] ServiceType? Service with multiple interfaces? (was: Re: First shot at Abstract Model)

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 16:10:55 +0200 (CEST)
To: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webMethods.com>
cc: fablet@crf.canon.fr, <keithba@microsoft.com>, <prasad.yendluri@webMethods.com>, <Waqar.sadiq@eds.com>, <sanjiva@us.ibm.com>, <ksankar@cisco.com>, Web Services Description mailing list <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205221608410.31247-100000@mail.idoox.com>
 Hi all,
 can someone please draft what the ServiceType addition to 
abstract model (and the related changes) would look like? 
 I'm thinking of Sanjiva who was one of the proponents of
ServiceType. 8-)
 Best regards,

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Tue, 21 May 2002, Prasad Yendluri wrote:

 > >  3) I don't believe we need Services as currently defined, I'd
 > > rather see them implementing a single Service Interface (and
 > > providing one or more InterfaceLocations for it).
 > 
 > <PY>BTW, Service is not an entity at the abstract level but I see your
 > point. I do think however being able to group portTypes (interfaces) is
 > useful. As Sanjiva had been arguing for also, having ServiceTypes that
 > group portTypes is more logical at the abstract level than going from
 > portType to port and Service.
 > </PY>
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 10:11:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT