W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

Re: language extensibility [was: updated part1 draft's (editor's copy)]

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 21:13:48 +0600
Message-ID: <028701c1f5d9$cc1fd0b0$07aa7cca@lankabook2>
To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Hi Igor,

That section was an appendix .. I need to bring it into the
part1 spec. Sorry, my bad.

In any case, I will insert an issue saying extensibility
needs to be verified and point your note as a proposal.

THanks,

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sedukhin, Igor" <Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; "WS-Desc WG (Public)"
<www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 8:47 PM
Subject: RE: language extensibility [was: updated part1 draft's (editor's
copy)]


> Sanjiva,
>
> The document says "The specific locations in the document where
extensibility elements can appear are described in detail in section A3."
> Where is that section?
>
> I have sent some extensibility additions earlier, I just want to see if
they made it in or not. I would really like to see proper language
extensibility explicitly indicated in a spec as per R067.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Igor Sedukhin .. (Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com)
> -- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:27 PM
> To: WS-Desc WG (Public)
> Subject: updated part1 draft's (editor's copy)
>
>
> As usual, closed issues appear in red while the pending ones are in
yellow.
>
> Sanjiva.
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 11:16:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT