W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

RE: issue: optional parts in <message>?

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 16:26:44 -0700
Message-ID: <2E33960095B58E40A4D3345AB9F65EC106E152EA@win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webMethods.com] writes
>>Now what if "part" d is a "foreign" type, for example some ASN.1
doodad? 
>>Assuming we have agreed on an appropriate definition of the asn.1 
>>namespace. 

>I think this is big assumption that will not scale in a generic way.
E.g. 
>any of the MIME types. 

As Sanjiva suggests, we should invest in making sure that the common,
interoperable representation types are described in a standard way,
whether described as the value of WSDL-specific part EII or as AII in an
XML Schema.

--Jeff
Received on Friday, 3 May 2002 21:25:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT