+1. 8-) Jacek Kopecky Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation http://www.systinet.com/ On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote: > > According to WSDL 1.1 the value of the name attribute of all port > elements in a WSDL document must be unique. Effectively, ports have > their own symbol space, along with messages, portTypes, bindings and > services. However, ports do NOT take on the target namespace of the WSDL > document, so it is impossible to refer to them from elsewhere ( e.g. > from another WSDL document ). For consistency, it would make sense to > say that the names of ports need only be unique within the service they > are contained by. > > Changes to spec: > > In section 3.8 change: > > The name attribute provides a unique name among all ports defined within > in the enclosing WSDL document > > To > > The name attribute provides a unique name among all ports defined within > a given service element > > > > Changes to schema: > > remove uniqueness constraint on wsdl:service/wsdl:port from definitions > global element declaration > Add uniqueness constraint for wsdl:port to service local element > declaration > > > Gudge >Received on Thursday, 4 July 2002 19:31:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:21 GMT