W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Issue: Support for optionality of parts in Messages

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:54:52 +0200
Message-ID: <3CC923EC.DB100E57@crf.canon.fr>
To: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Prasad, isn't this covered by issue 51 [1] already?

Jean-Jacques.

[1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html

Prasad Yendluri wrote:

> After thinking a little more, it seems to me this would be a useful
> addition.
>
> Usecase: A response message could optionally return one or more
> "attachments".
>
> We do have an example of having attachments in the MIME binding section
> of the specification (Section 5.11 Example 7) but, there is no way to
> specify those as optional with variable cardinality (minoccurs,
> maxoccurs). The example claims these are optional in the description
> part but, neither the "message" definitions (A 4.1 WSDL schema) nor the
> MIME bindings ( 4.4 MIME binding Schema) permit this.
>
> Regards, Prasad
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 05:55:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:19 GMT