- From: Aleksander Slominski <aslom@cs.indiana.edu>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 01:50:04 -0500
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
hi, in the last issue "Services and Service Types" the proposed solution is creation of serviceType element that i believe is an excellent idea especially if it would allow to aggregate not only portTypes but also serviceTypes recursively. however requiring for service that implements serviceType to have exactly one binding for each portType makes it impossible to provide multiple access mechanism to service (multiprotocol), for example SOAP/HTTP and EJB/RMI as equivalent protocols to interact with service. i think it is important to keep ability of client to introspects WSDL and employ the best access mechanism to service if choices are available (for example it may be SOAP but it may be something more optimized ...) finally: if service implements serviceType doe sit mean that service ports are accessing the same logical instance of service? thanks, alek Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > FYI: Attached are the slides I used to elaborate on some of the > issues in the WSDL 1.1 spec. Based on discussions at the F2F, we > decided to start discussing some of these issues. I will be > posting those issues shortly. > > Sanjiva. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Name: 11specissues.ppt > 11specissues.ppt Type: Microsoft PowerPoint Show (application/vnd.ms-powerpoint) > Encoding: base64 > Download Status: Not downloaded with message
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 02:50:41 UTC