The WG would like to solicit your comments on whether we should eliminate WSDL 1.1's "solicit-response" and "output-only" operations as we produce WSDL 1.2. Here are the two issues from the latest part1 document. Note that I have posted these together as the decisions obviously need to be coupled. <issue id="issue-remove-solicit-response-operations" status="open"> <head>Should we remove solicit-response operations?</head> Solicit-response operations are not fully defined in WSDL 1.1. There are multiple interpretations of these in the community: event, callback etc.. Also, there is little evidence that anyone is actually using them. We could consider replacing this with a first-class description of an event mechanism. <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source> </issue> <issue id="issue-remove-notification-operations" status="open"> <head>Should we remove notification operations?</head> Notification operations are also not fully defined in WSDL 1.1. There are multiple interpretations of these in the community: event, callback etc.. Also, there is little evidence that anyone is actually using them. We could consider replacing this with a first-class description of an event mechanism. <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source> </issue> Thanks, Sanjiva.Received on Saturday, 13 April 2002 08:15:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:19 GMT