W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-cg@w3.org > October 2006

MTOM description discussion

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:12:50 -0700
To: <www-ws-cg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00ab01c6f921$f8c00a90$3901a8c0@DELLICIOUS>
Summary of the state of the WSDL WG from this morning's call [1]:


No firm consensus yet on whether this WG would develop MTOM descriptive
capabilities (policy assertion, extension, or both) if the XMLP WG declines
to accept this topic.  There is so far a majority willing to adopt this
task, but not everyone has determined their position, or made their
preferences known, yet.  Canon requires a wsdl extension (a policy assertion
in addition is acceptable), and in a timely manner.


We also broached the topic of Patent Policy implications of doing this work
in the XMLP WG or in the WSDL WG, which quickly scared everyone away ;-).





Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com


Received on Thursday, 26 October 2006 17:39:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:43:13 UTC