W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2004

RE: Typical SOA ... SOA Patterns

From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 20:18:09 -0600
Message-ID: <7FCB5A9F010AAE419A79A54B44F3718E026F01EF@bocnte2k3.boc.chevrontexaco.net>
To: "Paul Denning" <pauld@mitre.org>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

I believe that the expansion of those @@ bullets was just intended to be
a link back to some section of the document.  That is, the text goes
through as is but it is a link back to something in the doc that is
relevant to that issue, exact link to be determined by the editors.  I
think usually to an "issue" flagged in the text.  As far as I know those
@@'s were not an instruction to the editors to rework the text enclosed
other than trivially.  I believe that those texts were discussed and
agreed to.

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Paul Denning
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 12:34 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Typical SOA ... SOA Patterns



I was suggesting it as another issue, not knowing how the editors might 
expand those bullets.  I'll back off on calling it another issue.

If the bullets are expanded by the editors, then perhaps a mention of
SOA 
could be factored into this existing issue:

@@The relationship between conversations, correlations and transactions
and 
choreography is unclear and needs more work.

For example, something like "resolution of these issues would also help 
clarify how web services relate to SOA."

You could also add a statement like that to

@@SOAP 1.2 and this architecture introduce the concept of
"intermediaries", 
but this concept is not represented in WSDL 2.0.

Paul

At 01:05 PM 2004-01-30, David Booth wrote:

>Paul,
>
>I'm unclear about your suggestion.  If it is about rewording one of the
>existing unresolved issues to be clearer, then I agree with MikeC that
we 
>have license to do this.  But if your suggestion is to *add* another 
>unresolved issue to the list, then I think it is too late.  We would
need 
>WG agreement on that.
>
>
>
>At 10:40 AM 1/30/2004 -0500, Paul Denning wrote:
>. . .
>>------
>>I am proposing
>>
>>@@Further work on the relationships between and patterns for using Web
>>services and SOA.
>>
>>(Would be nice to add it if we can, but I understand if it is too 
>>late.)
>>
>>[1]
>>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/arch/wsa/wd-wsa-arch-revie
w2.html#id5212661
>>
>>Paul
>
>--
>David Booth
>W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
>Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Saturday, 31 January 2004 21:19:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:25 GMT