- From: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:31:11 -0500
- To: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
At 02:10 PM 2004-01-14, David Orchard wrote: >And how does one >build "mustUnderstand" or "mustIgnore" into the validation logic yet express >a single schema? Why a single schema? Seems like there could be different schemas depending on the context. For example, a SOAP intermediary by want to validate the SOAP header blocks, but use <xs:any> for the body. The endpoint may want stong validation for the body before it does a non-safe operation (like debit a bank account). Perhaps rddl:purpose="..." can be used to find the appropriate xsd that you need, assuming a set of xsd's. (I kind of like the RDDL concept [1]). [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Dec/0035.html Then there is the view that well-formed XML is too much of a constraint: http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/archive.aspx?post=694 Paul
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2004 14:46:30 UTC