W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2004

RE: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6

From: He, Hao <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:32:01 +1100
Message-ID: <686B9E7C8AA57A45AE8DDCC5A81596AB0922DF1A@sydthqems01.int.tisa.com.au>
To: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
I think we all agree "web services can be used to implement OO as well as
SOA architectures", but we also want to say "web services are really
intended for SOA.  Web services for OO are not recommended."

Hao

-----Original Message-----
From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 11:27 AM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6



 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com] 
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 7:23 PM
> To: Bijan Parsia; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6
> 
> 
> Also look at the grid discussion in 
> http://www.sys-con.com/webservices/article.cfm?id=706 .

I've lost track -- does this discussion of the Grid entail changes to the
text I proposed?  If the bottom line is "web services can be used to
implement OO as well as SOA architectures", I'm pretty sure I stated that
clearly.  No?


Received on Monday, 12 January 2004 19:32:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:24 GMT