W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2004

RE: Fwd: RE: EDI and Security Text

From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:30:10 -0600
Message-ID: <7FCB5A9F010AAE419A79A54B44F3718E026F00E1@bocnte2k3.boc.chevrontexaco.net>
To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
Cc: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

I trust David to sort out this vicious controversy.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 6:06 AM
To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)
Cc: David Booth; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: EDI and Security Text

* Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
[2004-01-08 14:54-0600]
> Have you been following this thread, Hugo?  It seems to me that the 
> changes you propose would move it significantly in the direction that 
> I'm uncomfortable with, for reasons I have tried to explain (near the 
> bottom of the long thread).

You caught me. I must admit that I got lost in all the layers of

> FWIW, I personally think that it is NOT a good idea to recommend URI's
> for this purpose.   So our opinions seem to differ here.  But I am
> certainly willing to consider that a more detailed look at the 
> mechanisms might prove me wrong -- which I think David was trying to 
> indicate by talking about the issues involving details of engineering.
> At any rate, I certainly don't want to get involved in a big conflict 
> about this.  At the most I think we are talking about nuances, and I'm

> not emotionally involved with my nuance.

Same here. The clickable/dereferencable change I proposed isn't
problematic, it seems. For the rest, I'm happy to stay with some text
that you're comfortable with.



Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Friday, 9 January 2004 11:35:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:10 UTC