W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2004

RE: WS Architectural Loose Ends / Outstanding issues

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:22:29 -0500
Message-ID: <BDD579D96530CA4BAAAD5D9549BDE7790124AF93@resmsg01.sagus.com>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:10 PM
> To: Champion, Mike
> Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: WS Architectural Loose Ends / Outstanding issues
> 
> 
> Don't forget "interface constraints", at least for part of 
> the problem.

I'm not sure what you mean.  I should have been clear that "outstanding
issues" doesn't refer to our issues list; since the document is not going to
last call, there's no attempt to resolve all the issues that people have
raised against the document itself.  I'm talking about large-scale "issues"
in the Web services space that don't fit into a neat box, such as the fact
that intermediaries are in SOAP but not WSDL, and might fall thru the cracks
of public awareness without us around to annoy people about them.   [Grr,
David warned me that if I used the word "issues" that would confuse people!]


I feel confident in saying that you will not let the "interface constraints"
issue fall thru the cracks of public awareness. <grin> I guess one could
argue that the whole issue of the relationships among the hypertext Web,
Semantic Web, and services "web", is a bit of a loose end, but we do talk
about that at some length in the document itself, so I'm not sure what else
we could say in the final section.  I guess since I asked Katia to draft a
paragraph on what the WS/SW loose end is, I could ask you to draft a similar
paragraph about the loose end involving WS and the RESTful Web. Seem
reasonable?  Or am I misunderstanding?  I don't think there's much interest
in spending our last 4 weeks on earth debating REST any more, however, so
I'd suggest keeping it "fair and balanced".
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2004 14:22:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:24 GMT