RE: non-outcry over eBay SOAP interace

I decline to do this again.  See inumerable previous threads.

-----Original Message-----
From: He, Hao [mailto:Hao.He@thomson.com.au] 
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 3:19 PM
To: 'Michael Champion'; Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: non-outcry over eBay SOAP interace


Roger, 

Any idea why you "need the encapsulation of SOAP when performing
operations with a high level of contractual commitment."? I cannot see
the correlation here?

Hao

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Champion [mailto:mc@xegesis.org]
Sent: Friday, 13 February 2004 8:08
To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: non-outcry over eBay SOAP interace




On Feb 12, 2004, at 4:01 PM, Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) wrote:

> If you dig into the links a bit you find the following, which I like:
>
> So there you have it in a nutshell. The XML-over-HTTP openness of REST

> works best when you want to reach as wide a universe as possible. On 
> the other hand, you're going to need the encapsulation of SOAP when
> performing operations with a high level of contractual commitment.
Most
> applications will need to use some of each.
>
>
I like that too.. where was it?