W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > February 2004

RE: REST wrap-up (was Re: Web Services Architecture Document

From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:47:30 -0600
Message-ID: <7FCB5A9F010AAE419A79A54B44F3718E026F024B@bocnte2k3.boc.chevrontexaco.net>
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org

I don't think anyone will object to limiting the extent of the thread.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 3:46 PM
To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: REST wrap-up (was Re: Web Services Architecture Document


Thanks Roger (and Mike), for those answers.  They were just what I was
looking for, again.  I apologize for not asking them in the first round
of questions, but it only occurred to me afterwards that they wouldn't
provide me all the information I needed to really understand where folks
were coming from.

I presume you won't mind if I don't turn this into a thread 8-), but
just for the record, as you summized, I'm not in the a) camp, as my
understanding of software architecture tells me that some architectural
styles are not suitable for some domains (like the Internet).  I'll just
briefly mention again, that if you study enough Internet scale systems
(email, Web, instant messaging, even the telephone network), you'll find
that they *ALL* have one thing in common; a constrained interface
derived from an application abstraction (respectively, an inbox, a
resource, a user, and a telephone line).  I don't believe that's a
coincidence.

Cheers,

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 16:48:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:13:26 UTC