W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > February 2004

RE: Crossreferencing the spec list with Apache's

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 21:30:40 -0800
Message-ID: <EDDE2977F3D216428E903370E3EBDDC9032B8A3B@MAIL01.stc.com>
To: "Michael Champion" <mc@xegesis.org>
Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

I would link to the Apache list just as another example of attempts to
keep track of the existing Web services standards (attempts that are
becoming harder and harder ...).

I don't think we should necessarily endorse the contents of the Apache
list, given the fact that our group has never systematically analyzed
its contents.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Champion [mailto:mc@xegesis.org] 
> Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 7:14 PM
> To: Ugo Corda
> Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Crossreferencing the spec list with Apache's
> On Feb 1, 2004, at 10:00 PM, Ugo Corda wrote:
> > These messages seem to imply that our group was not aware of the 
> > Apache list. In fact, we already discussed it last October (see the 
> > "Apache" thread in the October archive). I actually modified the 
> > Apache list at that time, based on that same discussion.
> >
> That slipped past me somehow :-)
> Oh yes, at the time it was portrayed on our list as a WS-splat list, 
> not the same kind of thing as what we were doing.  As I recall I was 
> heavily focused on the day job at that point and just didn't follow 
> this carefully and check out the Apache list.  Sorry about 
> that ... the 
> logical thing to do would have been to make sure the Apache wiki had 
> everything we knew about, and then we would point to it going 
> forward.  
> Oh well ...
> Do you think we should ask David to link to the Apache list in the 
> Note, Ugo?
Received on Monday, 2 February 2004 00:30:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:10 UTC