RE: Intermediary Text

It seems that WS-Routing explicitly describes a message path through 
intermediaries, whereas WS-Addressing does not. Or perhaps I misread 
the spec. Could a WS-Addressing expert out there weigh in on its role 
and capabilites.

Thx, MikeM
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com]
>Sent: September 26, 2003 11:33 AM
>To: Jean-Jacques Moreau; Mahan Michael (NRC/Boston)
>Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
>Subject: RE: Intermediary Text
>
>
>
>> > - Router. A Web service message can follow a particular 
>> "path" through
>> > an arbitrary number of intermediaries where each Web service
>> > intermediaries would provide a value-added services to the message
>> > and hence to the application. Note that for a request-response MEP,
>> > the message may traverse through different intermediaries on it
>> > request and response paths. Routing intermediaries could belong to
>> > the trust domain of the requester, the provider, or some 
>> third party.
>> 
>> Maybe add a link to WS-Routing?
>
>Or to WS-Addressing. (My understanding is that WS-Addressing 
>has made WS-Routing obsolete).
>
>Ugo
>
>

Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 12:02:28 UTC