W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > September 2003

RE: Intermediary Text

From: <michael.mahan@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:59:25 -0400
Message-ID: <5C76D29CD0FA3143896D08BB1743296A023402AC@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com>
To: <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

It seems that WS-Routing explicitly describes a message path through 
intermediaries, whereas WS-Addressing does not. Or perhaps I misread 
the spec. Could a WS-Addressing expert out there weigh in on its role 
and capabilites.

Thx, MikeM

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com]
>Sent: September 26, 2003 11:33 AM
>To: Jean-Jacques Moreau; Mahan Michael (NRC/Boston)
>Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
>Subject: RE: Intermediary Text
>> > - Router. A Web service message can follow a particular 
>> "path" through
>> > an arbitrary number of intermediaries where each Web service
>> > intermediaries would provide a value-added services to the message
>> > and hence to the application. Note that for a request-response MEP,
>> > the message may traverse through different intermediaries on it
>> > request and response paths. Routing intermediaries could belong to
>> > the trust domain of the requester, the provider, or some 
>> third party.
>> Maybe add a link to WS-Routing?
>Or to WS-Addressing. (My understanding is that WS-Addressing 
>has made WS-Routing obsolete).
Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 12:02:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:22 GMT