W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2003

New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 06:55:00 -0400
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <20031024065500.C9730@www.markbaker.ca>

BTW, I'd like to raise the issue mentioned here as an official one
with the WG.  Thanks.

----- Forwarded message from Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> -----

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
To: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, Jim Webber <jim.webber@arjuna.com>
Subject: Re: What does WSDL describe?
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:45:53 -0400
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
X-RegEx-Original-IP: 18.29.1.71
X-Original-To: www-ws-desc@frink.w3.org
Delivered-To: www-ws-desc@frink.w3.org
Delivered-To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <BC28A9E979C56C44BCBC2DED313A4470021C388E@bond.ncl.ac.uk>; from Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk on Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 12:01:01AM +0100
X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/20031023214553.A9730@www.markbaker.ca
X-Mailing-List: <www-ws-desc@w3.org> archive/latest/2964
List-Id: <www-ws-desc.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2003 01:45:42.0606 (UTC) FILETIME=[88EE1EE0:01C399D0]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT,X_LOOP,X_MAILING_LIST
	version=2.43
X-Spam-Level: 


Thanks for your response, Savas, it was very helpful.  I'll just cut
to what appears to be the source of my confusion ...

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 12:01:01AM +0100, Savas Parastatidis wrote:
> I wouldn't call the above description as a "document endpoint" but
> effectively we are talking about exchange of documents (the messages).

Ok, but you're really talking about the exchange of two very different
kinds of documents; ones that contain only state (e.g. "12345"), and
ones that contain an operation and state (e.g. "add(12345)").  My
concern and confusion stems from the two apparently being treated the
same.

As a concrete example relevant to interoperability, consider the
semantics of a successful SOAP response to each of those two example
messages above.  For the first example, the response message can be
interpreted to mean "that data is successfully processed", which could
mean many things, but that's hidden from the client.  But in the
second example, what does success mean?  Does it mean that the data was
processed, or does it mean that the number 12345 was added to whatever
the existing state was?  It could mean both.  And when you combine that
with the issue Umit is talking about, it's even more ambiguous, as it
could mean something else entirely because the operation may not be in
the message. i.e. it could mean the same as "add(12345)", though only
"12345" is on the wire.  Yikes!

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Friday, 24 October 2003 06:54:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:23 GMT