- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:29:28 -0500
- To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Thanks for clarifying, Ugo. On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:17:23PM -0800, Ugo Corda wrote: > Regarding the unclear cases 7 and 8: > > 7. WSDL-based extensions > > The way I understand this case (again, I was not the author of the original list) is a WSDL (non-standard) extension that would describe routing information not expressed at the WSDL message level itself. The submitter would just look at that information and exploit whatever out-of-band mechanism is available (at any level of the transmission stack) to realize the described routing. I don't have any specific example of this, and in fact I think it was raised as a (in principle possible) speculation. That sounds like it wouldn't be part of the message. > 8. Using application-specific semantics > > I think this is just the case where routing info is expressed at the level of the application payload (no SOAP feature/module involved). So that would be in the message. Mark.
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:26:55 UTC