Swell. So, why are you keeping me in suspense? What does aggregation mean? So far, as far as I can tell (and God knows I could easily be wrong), I don't see any difference between your is-a and the UML is-a -- except that I find yours a lot easier to understand. But it was has-a where I was told specifically that there was a difference, so let's see what that difference is. Once we get these definitions sorted out I think that the WG needs to choose between the alternatives. This is not, IMHO, a no-brainer. -----Original Message----- From: Francis McCabe [mailto:fgm@fla.fujitsu.com] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 4:28 PM To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) Cc: Martin Chapman; www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: Re: isa and hasa in UML Roger: The UML definition of generalization is: >>>> Generalization is the taxonomic relationship between a more general >>>> element and a more specific element that is fully consistent and >>>> that adds additional information. >>>> FrankReceived on Friday, 30 May 2003 17:40:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:07 UTC