- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:48:49 -0700
- To: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Sorry for the mis-post - should have gone to www-ws-desc instead. Gotta watch my type-ahead... > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Marsh > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:23 PM > To: 'www-ws-arch@w3.org' > Subject: Agenda, 29 May 2003 WS Desc telcon > > 0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]: > > See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other > information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters. > > If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list > before the start of the telcon. > > [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0058.html > [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ > [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Agenda > > 1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is: > Erik Ackerman (fallbacks: Stephen White, Lily Liu, Ingo Melzer, > Don Mullen, Adi Sakala, Steve Lind, Igor Sedukhin, > Martin Gudgin, Sandeep Kumar, Dale Moberg) > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > 2. Approval of minutes: > - May 8 telcon [.1]; belated regrets from Glen. > - May 12-14 FTF minutes [.2, .3, .4] and Summary [.5] > - May 22 telcon [.6]; belated regrets from Youenn; missing action > item from Jacek [.7] added to AI list below; RESOLUTION: rename > @resource to @targetResource [.8], clarify meaning of the absence > of @targetResource [.9]. > > [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0037.html > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0042.html > [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0051.html > [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0052.html > [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0053.html > [.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/att- > 0066/minutes-22-May-2003.html > [.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0041.html > [.8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0046.html > [.9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0048.html > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > 3. Review of Action items [.1]. > RETIRED 2003-03-04: Editors to discuss markup for testable assertions > in the spec and come back with a strategy. > ? 2003-03-13: Don will write a proposal for annotating schema > with part information. > ? 2003-03-27: Philippe write up a proposal for embedding binary > data types in schema > DONE [.2] 2003-05-01: Jonathan to summarize WS Desc interest for XML > Schema subset to XML Schema WG. > DONE [.4] 2003-05-12: Editors to add (non-normative) pseudo-syntax > description of each component. > PENDING 2003-05-12: Jonathan to work on auto generating pseudo-syntax > from schema. > DONE [.4] 2003-05-12: Editors add more context to the specification - > provide more descriptive wording to make it > easier for someone to read the specification > and to relate to Web services etc. before > jumping into component-by-component > descriptions. > DONE [.3] 2003-05-12: Jonathan to take the above points to the XMLP/CG > worlds and see what to do next. > DONE [.4] 2003-05-12: Editors to reflect decision to have one interface > per <service>, add new attribute "interface" to > <service>, and add "resource" attribute to > <service>. > ? 2003-05-13: Umit to write up a variant of the endpoint > description proposal using schema annotation > syntax. > ? 2003-05-13: DaveO to send a motivating example for R131. > ? 2003-05-13: Jeffsch, Sanjiva, Glen, Umit, JJM to come up with > a proposal to get rid with the message construct, > and add programming hints. > ? 2003-05-14: Kevin to contact Sanjiva and try to merge > proposals. > ? 2003-05-22: Jacek to see how test assertions could be > expressed in RDF (and OWL in particular). > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-cg/2003May/0011.html > [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol- > wg/2003May/0063.html > [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0051.html > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > 4. Administrivia > a. July FTF [.1], RSVP for Wed dinner [.4]. > b. Publishing date. I'll ask the editors for their estimate on the > date new WDs incorporating changes up to the FTF will be available > for WG review. > c. XMLP request for WSDL WG to develop WSDL 1.1 binding for SOAP 1.2 > [.2]. SOAPBuilders proposal [.3]. > d. OASIS-W3C Web Services technical plenary feedback [.5] > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/3/05/f2fJulyLogistics.htm > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol- > wg/2003May/0064.html > [.3] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soapbuilders/message/7431 > [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0049.html > [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0057.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 5. Task Force Status. > a. Properties and Features > b. Patterns > c. Attribues [.1] > d. QA & Testing > > [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0030.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 6. New Issues. Merged issues list [.1]. > - Typos in Part 1 (Jacek) [.2] > > [.1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd- > issues.html > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0074.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 7. Using RDF in WSDL [.1]. > > [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0076.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 8. Proposal: rationalization of faults in patterns [.1]. > > [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0085.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 9. Simplification for HTTP binding for WSDL 1.2 [.1]. > Mark Baker notices a dependency upon issue #64 [.2] > > [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0063.html > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0065.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 10. Issue 6e: No matching part [.1]. > Jeffrey's proposal at [.2] > > [.1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd- > issues.html#x6e > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0067.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 11. Issue 71: Optional message content in http:urlReplacement [.1] > > [.1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd- > issues.html#x71 > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0068.html > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > 12. Issue 2: SOAPAction has been deprecated, as of SOAP 1.2 [.1]. > - Arthur's proposal to unify property URIs and QName URIs. [.2] > Alternatives include using property markup, or a QNamed > attribute. > - Proposal for advertising QoS features of a Web service in WSDL [.3]. > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x2 > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0047.html > [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0020.html > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > 13. R085 Describing endpoint references. [.1] > - General agreement to add such capability to WSDL, but > not agreement on the precise form of the annotations and > where in the WSDL they should reside. Awaiting proposal > from Umit. > - Related issue (?) dynamic discovery of a service [.2]. > > [.1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/att-0088/R085-20 > 03-04-22.html > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0004.html > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > 14. Binding enhancements > Sanjiva proposes [.1] to: > 1) Drop @interface from binding, since now in service. > 2) Allow inlining interface-wide binding within a port and > making binding optional. > 3) Define default binding (SOAP doc/lit). > 4) Dealing with operation specific SOAPActions. > Kevin proposes to [.2]: > 1) Allow reuse of parts of bindings through a BindingDetails > element and corresponding references. > Waiting for Kevin and Sanjiva to consolidate the proposals. > > [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0046.html > [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0068.html > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > 15. Removing message. > Investigating idea to cleanly separate interop at the message > format level from interop at the programming model level. Awaiting > proposal from Jeffsch et. al. to get rid with the message > construct, and add programming hints. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > 16. Moving MIME Type Information to the Interface [.1] > Awaiting proposal from Philippe. > > [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0028.html >
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2003 18:49:01 UTC