W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2003

Re: Proposed WSA doc language from RE: Separate concepts for "service " and "targetResource?"

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 16:22:41 -0400
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030522162240.E4091@www.markbaker.ca>

I'm ok with this from a not-interfere-with-the-Web POV, though I think
it's quite brittle as Walden noted.

One quick response.

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 09:54:40AM -0600, Champion, Mike wrote:
> -- the "don't want to get nice REST Resources covered with WSDL goo"
> response from someone misses the point.  The agent implementing the
> WSDL-defined interface *is* the only meaningful resource in a situation such
> as the one above.  

That's a closed world assumption; it assumes you know that the real
resources (printers, invoices, etc..) don't have URIs and aren't being
used directly via HTTP as well as via some open interface.  This is why
I'm concerned about interference; I don't what a URI identifying a
printer to be overloaded with goop that makes its identity ambiguous.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
  Actively seeking contract work or employment
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2003 16:19:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:19 GMT