W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2003

RE: Announce: WS-Callback, WS-MessageData, and WS-Acknowledgement specifications

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 10:33:01 -0700
Message-ID: <EDDE2977F3D216428E903370E3EBDDC90811B0@MAIL01.stc.com>
To: "Walden Mathews" <waldenm@optonline.net>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

> How widely is HTTP-R deployed?  If it's successful, why haven't I heard
> about it?  

These are good questions, but it's not clear the reasons are technical as you imply. Lack of adoption might depend on the fact that it was a proprietary specs, or other factors.

> If it's not successful, why would the next generation of the same
> saw be?  (What would be different?)

My understanding is that the HTTP-R authors decided to join the larger scope of SOAP-based reliability.

Ugo
Received on Friday, 16 May 2003 13:33:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:19 GMT