W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2003

RE: Proposed Venn Diagrams

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 13:19:05 -0400
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E405A96521@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Denning [mailto:pauld@mitre.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 1:04 PM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Proposed Venn Diagrams
> In the WSAWG telecon, Frank talked about the "uses" 
> relationship, so C is a 
> constrained subset of D.
> D can have lots of verbs, but C is limited to the "uniform" 
> set of verbs or 
> actions (ala REST).

Hmm, that's another way to look at this!  What do others think?   It makes
the "open" label on D appropriate, and alleviates the concern that "open" is
not the antonym of "uniform."

But C is a proper subset of the intersection of B and D, not D itself,
right?  And it's not simply the intersection of B and D because that's where
CGI hackery lives, I think.

OOoh, whoever suggested doing this with Venn diagrams should be given a
medal :-)  The Order of the Golden Trout!
Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 13:19:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:07 UTC