W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2003

RE: Proposed text for section 1.6.2 and 1.6.3

From: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 12:57:05 +1000
Message-ID: <686B9E7C8AA57A45AE8DDCC5A81596AB046AE48B@sydthqems01.int.tisa.com.au>
To: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
I was at the call and I got very confused, especially by the "open interface
services".  Since so many things are "open" nowadays, it can be very
misleading.

Hao

-----Original Message-----
From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 12:50 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Proposed text for section 1.6.2 and 1.6.3





> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hao He [mailto:Hao.He@thomson.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 10:23 PM
> To: 'David Orchard'; 'Champion, Mike'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Proposed text for section 1.6.2 and 1.6.3
> 
> 
> Would you be happy with RPC SOA?

We sortof, tentatively decided today to at least temporarily :-) talk about
"services" rather than "SOA" in this section, and the make the distinction
between "uniform interface services" (AKA "RESTful thingies") and "open
interface services" (AKA what everyone outside the W3C calls "Web
services.")   


Received on Thursday, 8 May 2003 22:55:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:18 GMT