W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2003

Re: Proposed text for section 1.6.2 and 1.6.3

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 20:54:22 -0400
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030507205422.B10304@www.markbaker.ca>

Visibility redundant?  My goodness.  IMO, it's the single most important
property than an Internet scale architecture can have.  Roy just wrote a
bit about it, in fact;

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rest-discuss/message/3649

That's my last word on visibility until after publication.

On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 02:33:18PM -0700, David Orchard wrote:
> Indeed, I had rebutted this point earlier.  REST has better visibility only
> for single protocol solutions, where visibility is defined to be the ability
> to determine the method.  I actually think that this property is redundant,
> as it is devolves to either the performance of the intermediary or the
> simplicity of the configuration of the intermediary.  Which are covered in
> the perf and simplicity properties.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 20:52:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:18 GMT