W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2003

RE: Proposed text for section 1.6.2 and 1.6.3

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 14:19:37 -0400
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E405985A6D@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 2:14 PM
> To: 'Champion, Mike'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Proposed text for section 1.6.2 and 1.6.3
> Application interface SOA doesn't differentiate from REST as 
> HTTP is an
> application protocol, and application interface and 
> application protocol
> seem awfully close to me.  Maybe API SOA is the right kind of 
> language, and
> maybe RESTless SOA is just like CGI.  Let's just embrace our 
> "bad" behaviour

Let me make sure I follow: are you suggesting the terms "REST SOA" and "API
SOA" as the two terms?  I like it, if just because they are short and don't
conflict with any "memes" out there now.

I guess I could live with "Custom Interface SOA" as well.
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 14:19:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:18 GMT