W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2003

RE: Privacy section - 1st draft

From: <michael.mahan@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 10:42:55 -0400
Message-ID: <5C76D29CD0FA3143896D08BB1743296A0101CEE1@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com>
To: <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

Good point. B2C privacy solutions may not suffice for B2B situtations.
I will address this point and probably modify some of the existing text 
to take this into account.

r, Mike

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)
>Sent: May 01, 2003 01:05 PM
>To: Mahan Michael (NRC/Boston); www-ws-arch@w3.org
>Subject: RE: Privacy section - 1st draft
>It seems to me that this section should deal somehow with the issue of
>individuals vs organizations.  Recall that in the P3P presentations we
>got it was made clear that present implementations of P3P have to do
>with information about individuals and the interaction between
>individuals (people) and Web sites or Web services.  Although it is
>possible to have people involved in the initiation and conceivably even
>the resolution of Web services, it is also possible to have situations
>where all parties involved are organizations.  That is, a company
>initiates a purchasing Web service offered by another company.  Or, in
>other words, the Legal Entity in our diagrams may be a person or an
>organization.  I believe that the current P3P framework is not intended
>to deal with issues involving organizations, and that these are
>generally dealt with via contracts separate from the Web service
>transaction itself.
>I think that this needs to be exposed explicitly because the org-to-org
>mode of operation may be much more common, or closer to the norm, than
>it is in Web operations oriented toward browsers.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: michael.mahan@nokia.com [mailto:michael.mahan@nokia.com] 
>Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 10:57 AM
>To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
>Subject: Privacy section - 1st draft
>Hi All,
>Here is my first cut at the privacy section which I sent to the editors
>a couple 
>weeks back. The known unfinished areas are demarked by pointy 
>Please comment.
Received on Friday, 2 May 2003 10:43:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:06 UTC