W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > March 2003

Re: Friendly amendment #2c [Re: Straw poll on "synchronous" definitions]

From: Geoff Arnold <Geoff.Arnold@Sun.COM>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 02:55:19 -0500
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-id: <3E72DC67.4010404@sun.com>

Two quick questions:

(1) Do people feel that we're converging on language which
addresses both two-party and multi-party interactions?
If not, does that matter?

(2) Are we confident that our definition is robust
enough to be adopted by the choreography folks?
Received on Saturday, 15 March 2003 02:55:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:16 GMT