- From: Duane Nickull <duane@xmlglobal.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 09:20:31 -0800
- To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Suggestion (My $0.02 CAD - take it or ignore it ;-) Reliable Messaging: 1) The ability: (a)of a sender of a message to be able to determine whether a given message has been received by its intended receiver and to take compensating action in the event a given message has been determined not to have been received. [DN] suggest wording reflect event driven methodology and add "within set parameters". Without imposing too tight an implementation constraint, it may be nice to at least suggest an event driven model. eg - change to: (a)of a message sender to receive verification that a a given message has been received by its intended receiver within the set parameters or receive an event-notification that it failed. (b)of the intended receiver of the message to be assured that it receives and processes a given message once and only once. (c)of both sender and receiver of a message to carry out (a) and (b) with a high probability of success in the face of inevitable, yet often unpredictable, network, system, and software failures. 2) Common Usage: An acknowledgement infrastructure between application and transport layers intended to improve messaging reliability as described above. -- VP Strategic Relations, Technologies Evangelist XML Global Technologies **************************** ebXML software downloads - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 12:20:33 UTC