W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Proposed text for 2.2.21 (take 2)

From: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:59:21 -0700
Cc: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>, www-ws-arch@w3.org, www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <39B30FD2-A8E2-11D7-AF91-000393A3327C@fla.fujitsu.com>

How does using GET to *send* a message fit with the semantics of GET?

Frank

On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 01:34  PM, Christopher B Ferris wrote:

>
> Frank McCabe wrote on 06/27/2003 11:05:47 AM:
>
>>
>> I would strongly suggest removing the references to using HTTP GET as 
>> a
>> way of sending messages. Mark B is right on this one. If you want to
>> use HTTP, the appropriate verb is POST.
>
> Hmmm... I'm fairly certain I disagree.
>
>>
>> I suggest further that the plain XML reference is not one that has 
>> been
>> endorsed by the group. Indeed I recall significant pushback on this
>> one...
>
> +1
>
>>
>> Frank
>
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> phone: +1 508 234 3624
>
>
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 17:00:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:21 GMT