> I would strongly suggest removing the references to using HTTP GET as a > way of sending messages. Mark B is right on this one. If you want to > use HTTP, the appropriate verb is POST. I don't fully understand your comment. I think Hao was referring to the Web Method feature of SOAP 1.2. According to that feature, an HTTP GET represents a particular binding of a SOAP Response MEP. So an HTTP GET used in this context is a legitimate realization of the type of messages we address in this spec. > I suggest further that the plain XML reference is not one that has been > endorsed by the group. Indeed I recall significant pushback on this one... I agree. UgoReceived on Friday, 27 June 2003 12:50:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:21 GMT