W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > June 2003

RE: Core concepts and relationships as an ontology?

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:10:26 -0400
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E40601FC62@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Katia Sycara [mailto:katia@cs.cmu.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:39 PM
> To: 'Champion, Mike'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Cc: katia@cs.cmu.edu
> Subject: RE: Core concepts and relationships as an ontology?

>  I can undertake to have the concepts and relationships in 
> rdf or daml.
> However, I am currently and for much of the summer on travel, 
> so if this
> task can wait till August, then I can do it. 

Hi Katia,

I don't think there's a big rush ... unless you think that DAML-S would help
us drain some of the trout ponds!
I doubt it, since I think our disagreements are about more than just the
logical implications of the concepts / relationships and more about fuzzier
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 14:10:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:07 UTC