Re: Counting noses on "is SOAP and/or WSDL intrinsic to the definitio n of Web service"

and WSDL (1.2) probably only means SOAP 1.2 and HTTP anyway.

JJ.

Jeff Mischkinsky wrote:
> Hi,
>    I pretty much agree with Chris here.
>    From my perspective it seems like a no-brainer that WSDL is required.
>    I think "at least" SOAP is required for interop reasons. Other 
> bindings are perfectly fine, but a minimum i think we should put in the 
> constraint that a SOAP binding is always required.
> 
>    I guess that makes me a +10.
> 
> cheers,
> jeff

Received on Friday, 6 June 2003 11:10:34 UTC