W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2003

RE: Polls (was RE: Proposed text for 2.2.21 (take 2))

From: He, Hao <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 14:47:06 +1000
Message-ID: <686B9E7C8AA57A45AE8DDCC5A81596AB046AE5FE@sydthqems01.int.tisa.com.au>
To: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/3005

Did I just make myself unpopular by posting this link?

Hao

-----Original Message-----
From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 6:16 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Polls (was RE: Proposed text for 2.2.21 (take 2))



 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francis McCabe [mailto:fgm@fla.fujitsu.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:44 PM
> To: Hao He
> Cc: 'David Orchard'; 'Ugo Corda'; 'Anne Thomas Manes'; 
> www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Proposed text for 2.2.21 (take 2)
> 
> 
> I think the group should vote on this. This is the same thing 
> that has been debated again and again; it is time to put it to bed.

Vote on what?  The text for the "message" concept that Hao is working on?
Or the trout-pond-from-RESTifarian-hell "is a plain XML message without SOAP
headers a Web service?"   We have a new ability to create straw polls
easily, so please propose some wording.  (Any chronically festering issue is
fine, and I'm asking the group not just Frank)


Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2003 00:45:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:21 GMT