W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2003

RE: RM and Intermediaries

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:49:38 -0800
Message-ID: <A60C40997573F04C8D778D1B5D799C3B20D3A9@mail2002.stc.com>
To: "Ricky Ho" <riho@cisco.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

Last month I raised a similar issue, and I got an extensive response from David Burdett at [1], which you might want to look at.

Ugo

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Dec/0095.html 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ricky Ho [mailto:riho@cisco.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 7:50 AM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RM and Intermediaries
> 
> 
> 
> Lets say S is the sender endpoint, R is the receiver 
> endpoint, and i1, i2 
> are intermediaries that pre-process the message.
> 
> S --> i1 --> i2 --> R
> 
> Do i1 and i2 have to understand RM ? or RM is just an end-to-end 
> handshaking between S and R ?  If so, can S pick a different 
> path in its 
> message resend ?
> 
> Rgds, Ricky
> 
> 
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2003 19:50:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:13 GMT