W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Summing up on visibility(?)

From: Walden Mathews <waldenm@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:40:38 -0500
To: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-id: <003801c2b8f9$4cf83e60$1702a8c0@WorkGroup>


> > Actually, I didn't think of asking them to do anything.  I was just
> > prying at some stuff that looked to me like popular fallacy, in the hope
> > that if distinct points were put to rest, different conclusions might
> > emerge.  I think I showed how a legacy service with no idempotent
> > operations can be wrapped in an idempotent interface [1].  This was
> > counter to a claim that the only way to get to idempotence was to
> > burden the client with sequence numbers.  No one has answered my
> > claim or provided a harder case.  This was supposed to be a reason
> > why RM was necessary.  I'm just wondering if that opinion moved
> > even slightly in response to my post.
> Can you repeat the explanation?

It's at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2003Jan/0326.html.

Received on Friday, 10 January 2003 17:40:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:02 UTC